Just heard back from my shop, and my entire transom assembly is rot. I never considered the possibility that a transom would be toast on a boat this new. In fact - this is one of the reasons that I wanted a Formula as I have read numerous time that the way in which formula seals their transom assembly makes it nearly impossible for such an occurrence. Obviously not the case.
The issue has been ongoing for several years per my glass guy, who coincidentally used to work for Formula in that capacity around the era when this boat was constructed. I did what any consumer would do, I reached out to the manufacturer asking for assistance since the issue has quite obviously been ongoing within the initial warranty period for the hull. This is the response I received:
That's fine on the surface, except taking this stance pretty much eliminates Formula's liability for 99.9% of the issues that may result from a product designed to be on the water. If faulty installation of the drive assembly (over/under torque, mis-aligned seal, etc etc) were to be root cause, they can wash their hands for the SIGNIFICANT damage that may occur as a result. At absolute minimum I would have expected a conversation on the topic rather than a one sentence reply via email to the issue.
While I did not buy the boat new, I did purchase what I thought to be a premium product on the secondary market (yes, it was surveyed) from a premium brand. A rotten transom within 11 or so years from the initial launch of ANY boat is not what I would expect from a "premium" product, especially when there are no signs of apparent abuse. Given the scarcity with which this seems to occur, it would be reasonable to assume it stemmed from the manufacturer rather than an act of God.
To be clear, in no way did I expect Formula to pay to replace my transom. I did finally touch base with a regional manager after several messages (no return calls), but the end result was a hard stance that Formula would wash their hands of this. At minimum a concession greater than "we can't predict everything that could happen to a boat over the years" would have been appreciated. I see stories here and elsewhere about the fantastic customer service afforded to Formula boat owners, something I have been privy to first hand. However, it seems that when it comes time to REALLY stand behind their product Formula is simply unwilling to do so. In fact, it was iterated numerous times that "should this have been identified within the first couple of years of ownership MABYE there is something we could have done." Reading between the lines - even on a new boat, if you get water in the transom Formula will likely wash their hands of it.
Furthermore, there was not even a consideration towards requesting the location of the boat to conduct an investigation into the issue. No request to speak with my glass guy who could have identified the root cause. Nothing. If a brand stands behind their products, I would have expected more. If the end result of such investigation would have been the same, it would have at least showed a level of interest in betterment of the brand that I could stand behind. Nothing of this nature was suggested. I even offered contact information for the gentleman working on the boat should Formula want to investigate further and was met with dismissal.
To each member on this forum, I hope your ownership experience and dealings with Formula are less disappointing than my own.
The issue has been ongoing for several years per my glass guy, who coincidentally used to work for Formula in that capacity around the era when this boat was constructed. I did what any consumer would do, I reached out to the manufacturer asking for assistance since the issue has quite obviously been ongoing within the initial warranty period for the hull. This is the response I received:
The structural warranty covers The hull and deck structural elements, stringers, bulkheads, fiberglass grid and matrix system. Unfortunately it does not cover failed seals that cause damage.
That's fine on the surface, except taking this stance pretty much eliminates Formula's liability for 99.9% of the issues that may result from a product designed to be on the water. If faulty installation of the drive assembly (over/under torque, mis-aligned seal, etc etc) were to be root cause, they can wash their hands for the SIGNIFICANT damage that may occur as a result. At absolute minimum I would have expected a conversation on the topic rather than a one sentence reply via email to the issue.
While I did not buy the boat new, I did purchase what I thought to be a premium product on the secondary market (yes, it was surveyed) from a premium brand. A rotten transom within 11 or so years from the initial launch of ANY boat is not what I would expect from a "premium" product, especially when there are no signs of apparent abuse. Given the scarcity with which this seems to occur, it would be reasonable to assume it stemmed from the manufacturer rather than an act of God.
To be clear, in no way did I expect Formula to pay to replace my transom. I did finally touch base with a regional manager after several messages (no return calls), but the end result was a hard stance that Formula would wash their hands of this. At minimum a concession greater than "we can't predict everything that could happen to a boat over the years" would have been appreciated. I see stories here and elsewhere about the fantastic customer service afforded to Formula boat owners, something I have been privy to first hand. However, it seems that when it comes time to REALLY stand behind their product Formula is simply unwilling to do so. In fact, it was iterated numerous times that "should this have been identified within the first couple of years of ownership MABYE there is something we could have done." Reading between the lines - even on a new boat, if you get water in the transom Formula will likely wash their hands of it.
Furthermore, there was not even a consideration towards requesting the location of the boat to conduct an investigation into the issue. No request to speak with my glass guy who could have identified the root cause. Nothing. If a brand stands behind their products, I would have expected more. If the end result of such investigation would have been the same, it would have at least showed a level of interest in betterment of the brand that I could stand behind. Nothing of this nature was suggested. I even offered contact information for the gentleman working on the boat should Formula want to investigate further and was met with dismissal.
To each member on this forum, I hope your ownership experience and dealings with Formula are less disappointing than my own.
Last edited: